tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2237906900456925233.post2330180476131701925..comments2023-10-18T23:36:58.396+08:00Comments on 數學資料庫手記: 又是66.6%MathDBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18353093974880979999noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2237906900456925233.post-82992881751133530992009-03-27T09:58:00.000+08:002009-03-27T09:58:00.000+08:00Yes, I gave a similar explaination to them also.Yes, I gave a similar explaination to them also.Marco_Dickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03383264762268852803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2237906900456925233.post-56307632504125265232009-03-25T12:37:00.000+08:002009-03-25T12:37:00.000+08:00For case 1,Give him an counterexample is easy to e...For case 1,<BR/>Give him an counterexample is easy to explain why Binary search not work.<BR/><BR/>Ask him to check for m=499 and m=501<BR/>both m=499 and m=501 不可行 but m=500 可行<BR/><BR/>>m=300不可行的話就試m=(300+500)=400<BR/>so he cannot exclude the solution is in btw 100 ~ 300.Pophttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17406316084081487132noreply@blogger.com