tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2237906900456925233.post4540609668091343644..comments2023-10-18T23:36:58.396+08:00Comments on 數學資料庫手記: A Nice Proof of "Infinite Primes of Form 4k+1"MathDBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18353093974880979999noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2237906900456925233.post-73718350659160424562008-10-22T10:51:00.000+08:002008-10-22T10:51:00.000+08:00Yes, you are correct! Actually p can be any prime ...Yes, you are correct! Actually p can be any prime factor of (N!)^2+1. That sounds a more amazing result.Marco_Dickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03383264762268852803noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2237906900456925233.post-76002151331098998032008-10-22T09:40:00.000+08:002008-10-22T09:40:00.000+08:00Is the assumption 'p is the SMALLEST prime factor'...Is the assumption 'p is the SMALLEST prime factor' used in the proof?Singmayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10355377961945631283noreply@blogger.com